QUALITATIVE RESEARCH OF KINDS OF RELIGIOUS NORMS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Within the sociocognitive approach, the religious norms are determined as the subjective representations of the results of a person’s cognitive processing of the information about the religious phenomena presented in the culture. The religious norms are present within the everyday life language and expressed as the normative judgments reflecting the correctness and preference of social behavior and way of thinking. Certain normative judgments do not exist independently of each other but form the clusters that can be considered as the kinds of social norms.  

The goal of presented empirical research is to determine the kinds of religious norms expressed as a normative judgment. The study tests a hypothesis about a verbal expression in the form of normative judgments of the enculturated religious experience. As the data-collection method, the author uses the semi-structured interviews method determining the judgments about the norms in the context of the evaluative attitude. The evaluations are expressed in respect of the objects that are the bearers of desired norms or adhere to them. The elements of phenomenography and matrix analysis serve as the method of qualitative data analysis.   

The study allows speaking about the existence of at least four kinds of religious norms: responsibility attribution norms, social interaction norms, interpersonal interaction norms, and self-introduction norms. Thus, the religious norms form a fragment of the individual psychological reality caused by the patterns of social behavior determining its acceptability and usefulness. 

Quoted results and conclusions offer the opportunities for the study of confessional differences when determining the types and inner content of the religious norms representations. Moreover, the results of the study highlight the necessity to specify the functions of religious norms representations in the context of social adaptation.

About the authors

Aleksandr Yurievich Chernov

Volgograd State University, Volgograd

Author for correspondence.
Email: chernov@volsu.ru

Doctor of Sciences (Psychology), Associate Professor, professor of Chair of psychology

Russian Federation

References

  1. Richardson F.C. Psychology and Religion: Hermeneutic Reflections. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 2006, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 232–250.
  2. Timoshchuk A.S., Fedotova I.N., Shavkunov I.V. Vvedenie v religiovedenie [Introduction to Religion Studies]. Vladimir, VYuI FSIN Rossii Publ., 2014. 136 p.
  3. Suchkova O.V. Sotsialno-psikhologicheskie aspekty religioznosti molodezhi v kontekste psikhologicheskoy bezopasnosti. Avtoref. dis. kand. psikhol. nauk [Socio-psychological aspects of religious youth in the context of psychological safety]. Sankt Petersburg, 2009. 25 p.
  4. Ugrinovich D.M. Psikhologiya religii [Psychology of religion]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1986. 352 p.
  5. Bulanova I.S. Types of personal changes in the context of religious conversion. V mire nauchnykh otkrytiy, 2014, no. 11.1, pp. 434–446.
  6. Sklyarova T.V. Religious socialization: research problems and direction. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriya 4: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya, 2009, no. 4, pp. 7–17.
  7. Argyle M. Religion behavior. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul Publ., 1958. 190 p.
  8. Nikishova N.V. Notion and essence of social norm: social-philosophical analysis. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2014, no. 1-II, pp. 147–149.
  9. Shvets D.S. Sotsialnaya norma i deviatsii: teoreticheskiy analiz. Avtoref. dis. kand. sotsiol. nauk [Social norm and deviations: theoretical analysis]. Moscow, 2006. 148 p.
  10. Bicchieri C. The Grammar of Society: the Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. The Grammar of Society. New York, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2006, pp. 28–30.
  11. Dobrin Yu.K. Social Norm in Traditional and Modern Society. Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya, 2011, no. 1, pp. 116–121.
  12. Cialdini R. Descriptive social norms as underappreciated sources of social control. Psychometrika, 2007, vol. 72, pp. 263–268.
  13. Pyysiainen I. How religion works: Toward a new cognitive science of religion. Boston, 2001. 150 p.
  14. Kurysheva O.V., Chernov A.Yu. Soderzhanie i spetsifika sotsialno-vozrastnykh norm v period vzroslosti [Content and specificity of social-age norms in the adulthood period]. Volgograd, VolGU Publ., 2015. 245 p.
  15. Dubias N. A sociocognitive approach to social norms. New York, 2002. 259 p.
  16. Kvale S. Issledovatelskoe intervyu [Research interview]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2003. 301 p.
  17. Chernov A.Yu. Kachestvennyy podkhod v psikhologicheskom issledovanii [High-Quality Approach in Psychological Research]. Volgograd, VolGU Publ., 2008. 340 p.
  18. Barnard A., McCosker H., Gerber R. Phenomenography: A Qualitative Research Approach for Exploring Understanding in Health Care. Qualitative Health Research, 1999, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 212–226.
  19. Averill J.B. Matrix Analysis as a Complementary Analytic Strategy in Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 2002, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 855–866.
  20. Whitehouse H. Modes of religiosity: towards a cognitive explanation of the sociopolitical dynamics of religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 2002, no. 14, pp. 293–315.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies