THE STUDY OF SEMANTIC UNIVERSALS OF TIME EVALUATION BY THE TEST SUBJECTS WITH VARIOUS LIFE SCRIPT TYPES


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Currently, there are a large number of works, carrying out the comparative analysis of various psychological concepts. The solution to the problem of comparative analysis allows reaching the synergy when the explanatory power of a combined model surpasses the original models. Thus, the existing models of a person’s life script description as the structure of the world image nuclear layer sidestep its projecting on the semantic structures of time evaluation that causes the relevance of this work.

The paper covers the analysis of the results of the semantic study of the ideas of test subjects with various life script types about their lifetime. Considering a person’s life script as a component of the structure of the world image nuclear layer manifested in the structuring of the subject’s lifetime, the author hypothesizes that the test subjects with various life script types will evaluate their lifetime in different ways.

To test this hypothesis, the test subjects with various life script types evaluated their lifetime using specialized semantic “time” differential. Data processing was carried out using the method of semantic universals.

The results display the relevance of time evaluation semantic universals to the type of a person’s life script. When evaluating similar descriptors belonging to semantic universals of all groups, test subjects with various life script types differ in the degree of group cohesiveness of evaluation, while the specific descriptors belonging to the semantic universals of test subjects with various life script types correspond to the life script features.

About the authors

Viktor Aleksandrovich Skleynis

Magadan Institute of Economics of Saint-Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics, Magadan

Author for correspondence.
Email: psy-adept@rambler.ru

PhD (Psychology), assistant professor of Chair of Economics and Management, Mathematics and Humanities

Russian Federation

References

  1. Bern E. Lyudi, kotorye igrayut v igry [People who play games]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2003. 576 p.
  2. Steiner C. Script and Counterscript. Transactional analysis journal, 1966, vol. 5, no. 18, pp. 133–135.
  3. Styuart I., Dzhoyns V. Sovremennyy tranzaktnyy analiz [The modern transactional analysis]. Sankt Petersburg, Metanoyya Publ., 2017. 444 p.
  4. Kuznetsova N.V. Individualno-tipologicheskie kompleksy zhiznennogo stsenariya i strategicheskikh menedzherskikh sposobnostey. Dis. kand. psikhol. nauk [Individually-typological complexes of life scenario and strategic managerial abilities]. Ufa, 2004. 144 p.
  5. Asmolov A.G. Po tu storonu soznaniya: metodologicheskie problemy neklassicheskoy psikhologii [On the other side of consciousness: the methodological problems of non-classical psychology]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2002. 480 p.
  6. Mizinova I.A. The Vital Script of the Personality: the Basic Approaches to Consideration. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, 2013, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 59–64.
  7. Kineleva O.V. Past, present and future in the temporal structure of consciousness of the subject. Lichnost i ee zhiznennyy mir: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, posvyashchennoy 20-letiyu fakulteta psikhologii OmGU im. F.M. Dostoevskogo. Omsk, OmGU Publ., 2013, pp. 77–82.
  8. Golovakha E.I., Kronik A.A. Psikhologicheskoe vremya lichnosti [Psychological time of personality]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2008. 272 p.
  9. Serkin V.P. Psikhosemantika [Psychosemantics]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2016. 318 p.
  10. Leontev D.A. Psikhologiya smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoy realnosti [The psychology of meaning: nature, structure and dynamics of semantic reality]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2007. 511 p.
  11. Skleynis V.A. Comparative analysis of the structures of an image of the world and types of lifescripts of teenagers and their parents. The sixth international conference on development of education and psychological science in Eurasia. Vienna, 2016, pp. 48–50.
  12. Skleynis V.A. Modeling Life-Scenario Aspects via Integrated Public Relations- Communications Tools. Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2014, no. 8, pp. 97–101.
  13. Skleynis V.A. Psychosemantic correlates of the life script. Molodoy uchenyy, 2016, no. 7, pp. 336–340.
  14. Lykyanova S.P. Method of the research of the lifescript. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimentalnaya psikhologiya, 2011, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 55–61.
  15. Gurskaya S.P. Program of script behavior: phenomenology. Vestnik Yuzhno-Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologiya, 2013, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 101–104.
  16. Sokolov D.M. Skazki i skazkoterapiya [The fairy tales and the fairy tale therapy]. Moscow, Eksmo-Press Publ., 2001. 304 p.
  17. Zinkevich-Evstigneeva T.D. Praktikum po skazkoterapii [Workshop on fairy tale therapy]. Sankt Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2000. 312 p.
  18. Fon Frants M.-L. Psikhologiya skazki. Tolkovanie volshebnykh skazok [The psychology of fairy tale. The interpretation of fairy tales]. Sankt Petersburg, B.S.K. Publ., 1998. 340 p.
  19. Serkin V.P. The blank of semantic differential for evaluation of submissions on time. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika, 2007, no. 5, pp. 30–35.
  20. Skleynis V.A. Comparative analysis of the semantic universalities of the evaluation of ideas about yourself and the type of lifescript. Mir nauki, 2016, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–6.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies