THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SYSTEM OF ASSESSMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS’ ACTIVITY IN THE PRC


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The relevance of the topic chosen for the research is primarily caused by the reforming and development of higher education system in the PRC as well as by the effort of the country to guarantee and improve the quality of higher education against the backdrop of its rapid development. After the end of the “Cultural Revolution” in China, great socio-political, economic and cultural changes require both the adequate transformation of higher education and the assessment of its quality. Until today, a complete uniform system for assessing the activities of higher education institutions to ensure and constantly improve the quality of higher education has not been formed in China. The paper summarizes the main reasons for the necessity of reforming the system of assessment of higher education institutions performance in new social conditions of China and describes the process of development and improvement of this system in the context of the development of higher education in China. The author analyzes the functions and technologies of various evaluation mechanisms in this system, such as accreditation, assessment of accredited specialties for training in higher education institutions, assessment of the universities’ educational activity on baccalaureate, licensing, universities’ self-assessment and independent professional public assessment. Using the specific examples, the author notes the process of implementation and optimization of the abovementioned evaluation tools, points out their functional and methodological weaknesses as well as the non-systemic and uncoordinated interaction. Based on the results of the work on the assessment of the universities’ activity in China and considering the strategic priorities of the development of education in 2010–2020, the trends in the development of evaluation system of Chinese universities are shown to enhance the effectiveness of this system and to ensure the quality of higher education in the country.

About the authors

Haikun Shao

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow

Author for correspondence.
Email: 1987alesha@mail.ru

intern of Faculty of Educational Studies

Russian Federation

References

  1. Tszya Yuntan, Lo Khuatao. The historical investigation on the higher education development path of new China: analysis from theory of late development. Vysshee obrazovanie, 2016, no. 5, pp. 1–12.
  2. Chzhou Lyanshu, Chzhu Menguan. Role of CPC in higher education development during 1978–1989. Issledovanie istorii KPK i obuchenie, 2013, no. 5, pp. 21–29.
  3. Chzhan Syvu. China’s higher education development: scale and quality. Vestnik Sychuanskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Sotsialnye nauki, 2006, no. 1, pp. 40–46.
  4. Chen Tunshun, Gao Fey. Reform of national accreditation system in modern China. Vysshee obrazovanie v provintsii Tszyansu, 2007, no. 4, pp. 80–83.
  5. Se Guykhua. National accreditation of the University and training of undergraduates and doctoral students after the policy of reform and openness in China: historical development and leap. Issledovanie vysshego obrazovaniya v Kitae, 2008, no. 12, pp. 6–10.
  6. Du In. National accreditation in China: status-quo and reform. Uchenaya stepen i podgotovka magistrantov i doktorov, 2008, no. 8, pp. 61–66.
  7. Su Chzhaobin, Li Tyanyan. A review of China’s assessment and accreditation system for academic degree programs. Podgotovka magistrantov i doktorov, 2011, no. 2, pp. 11–14.
  8. Gan Khuey, Lo Yun, Sun Chzhitsyan. Strategic choice of perfection for indicators of accreditated discipline. Issledovanie vysshego obrazovaniya v Kitae, 2011, no. 24, pp. 16–19.
  9. Van Dan, Lyao Khen. Assessment for activities of undergraduate education: status-quo and perspective. Ekzamen, 2010, no. 22, pp. 195–196.
  10. Li Chzhikhun. Mechanism of assessment for educational activities in undergraduate education. Vestnik Natsionalnoy akademii obrazovatelnoy administratsii, 2005, no. 8, pp. 3–8.
  11. Vu Dunfan, Sy Syaokhun. Assessment system of undergraduate education: review and retrospection. Vestnik Shansi pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya. Filosofiya i sotsialnye nauki, 2009, no. 1, pp. 122–128.
  12. Shao Kh., Popov L.V. Assessment of undergraduate educational activities in Chinese universities. Lomonosovskie chteniya: sbornik statey i tezisov nauchnoy konferentsii. Moscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2015. Vyp. 13, pp. 30–36.
  13. Lo Dunkhay. Innovational development of Assessment system for undergraduate education. Otsenka kachestva vysshego obrazovaniya v Kitae, 2009, no. 1, pp. 53–56.
  14. Lyu Chzhentyan. The overall design and system innovation of China’s new round undergraduate teaching assessment. Vysshee obrazovanie, 2012, no. 3, pp. 23–28.
  15. Go Khuey, Tan Veykhua, Lyu Lin. Self-assessment and teaching quality improvement in universities. Vysshee tekhnicheskoe obrazovanie, 2012, no. 3, pp. 146–152.
  16. Zhuan Chzhenchzhen, Men Syanchen. The logic, problems and countermeasures of the self-evaluation system in China’s universities. Meytan Vysshee obrazovanie, 2017, no. 4, pp. 11–15.
  17. Chan Khunli. Current status of reportorial system for undergraduate education. Issledovanie v oblasti yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya, 2015, no. 2, pp. 306–319.
  18. Chan Chzhiyun. Problems with indicators of higher educational quality. Sychuanskiy universitet iskusstv i nauk, 2010, no. 4, pp. 107–110.
  19. Popov L.V., Shao Khaykun. Evaluation of Chinese universities in national and international rankings. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 20: Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie, 2015, no. 2, pp. 99–116.
  20. Yuy Syaobo, Lu Tsiyue, Van Ley. On the social evaluation of university. Vysshee obrazovanie, 2015, no. 4, pp. 33–38.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies