DETERMINATION OF THE LEVELS OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTELLIGENCE TYPES IN THE CONTEXT OF LEARNING FOREIGN LANGUAGES


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper considers the application of Gardner’s multiple intelligence theory as one of the methods to introduce the subject individuation while teaching foreign language to non-linguistic students. The importance of the study is caused by the search for the new forms and methods of teaching a foreign language to achieve maximum efficiency within the constantly increasing requirements to the level of the foreign language communicative competence of graduates from non-linguistic universities.

The author presents the survey of the multiple intelligence theory and gives the definitions of the concepts of “intelligence”, “intelligence type”, “intelligence type in the context of learning a foreign language”.

The paper describes the preliminary phase of the second stage of the experimental work which has proved the efficiency of application of the conceptual foundations of the multiple intelligence theory to teaching a foreign language. The results of the three-stage experiment were published in 2017; in the current work the author analyzes the preliminary questionnaire survey.

The paper presents the technique of determination of the levels of development of the intelligence types in the context of learning a foreign language. The technique is based on the ideas of the author of multiple intelligence theory about the contextuality of intelligence types, the opportunity for their development, the intelligence constituents (tools, record system, and assistants network). The emphasis is made on the leading role of an exercise in the intelligence formation; an exercise is considered as a tool for the development of the intelligence types.

Based on the results of the survey conducted, it is determined that the levels of development of the intelligence types in the context of learning a foreign language depend both on the frequency of application to the learning process of the exercises involving these intelligence types and on the personal attitude of the students to these exercises. The “Foreign Language” discipline has a high potential for the development of verbal-linguistic, interpersonal and visual-spatial types of intelligence.

About the authors

Anastasiya Sergeevna Kovaleva

Pskov State University, Pskov

Author for correspondence.
Email: lebedeffa@inbox.ru

postgraduate student 

Russian Federation

References

  1. Passov E.I. Kommunikativnyy metod obucheniya inoyazychnomu govoreniyu [Communicative method of teaching foreign speech]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1991. 223 p.
  2. Passov E.I., Kuzovleva N.E. Urok inostrannogo yazyka [Foreign language lesson]. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 2010. 610 p.
  3. Gardner H. Multiple Intelligence: The Theory in practice. New York, Basic Books Publ., 1993. 304 p.
  4. Gardner H. Are there additional Intelligences? The case for the Naturalist Intelligence. Cambridge, President and Fellows of Howard College Publ., 1995. 195 р.
  5. Barrington E. Teaching to student diversity in higher education: How multiple intelligence theory can help. Teaching in Higher Education, 9. London, Carfax Publ. Ltd, 2004, pp. 421–434.
  6. Boss J. The autonomy of moral intelligence. Educational Theory, 2005, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 399–416.
  7. Brody N. What cognitive intelligence is and what emotional intelligence is not. Psychological Inquiry, 2004, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 234–238.
  8. Mayer J.D., Roberts R.D., Barsade S.G. Human Abilities: Emotional Intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 2008, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 507–536.
  9. Chen J., Moran S., Gardner H. Multiple intelligences around the world. New York, Jossey-Bass Publ., 2009. 408 p.
  10. Gardner H. Multiple intelligences: New horizons. New York, Basic Books Publ., 2006. 300 p.
  11. Azimov E.G., Shchukin A.N. Novyy slovar metodicheskikh terminov i ponyatiy (teoriya i praktika obucheniya yazykam) [New glossary of methodological terms and concepts (theory and practice of teaching languages)]. Moscow, Ikar Publ., 2009. 448 p.
  12. Zimnyaya I.A. Psikhologiya obucheniya inostrannym yazykam v shkole [Psychology of foreign language teaching at school]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1991. 222 p.
  13. Kovaleva A.S. Application of G. Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligence to writing of contemporary English textbooks. Yazyk i kultura v bilingvalnom obrazovatelnom prostranstve: sbornik materialov II mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Pskov, Logos Publ., 2016, pp. 122–136.
  14. Kovaleva A.S. Individualization of foreign language teaching in non-linguistic universities. Yazyk i kultura v bilingvalnom obrazovatelnom prostranstve: sbornik materialov I mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Pskov, Logos Publ., 2015, pp. 215–227.
  15. Kovaleva A.S. The role of subjective individualization in improving the second language skills of students from non-linguistic specialties. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika, psikhologiya, 2017, no. 4, pp. 29–35.
  16. Bloom B.S. Taxonomy of education objectives: The classification of education goals: handbook i, cognitive domain. New York, Longman Publ., 1956. 207 p.
  17. Mitchell H.Q. New Yippee! Austin, MM Publ., 2012. 116 p.
  18. Prodromou L., Prodromou P., Cowan A. Flash on English. Recanati, ELI Publ., 2011. 144 p.
  19. Puchta H., Rinvolucri M. Multiple Intelligence in EFL. London, Helbling Languages Publ., 2005. 158 p.
  20. Gardner G. Struktura razuma: teoriya mnozhestvennogo intellekta [Structure of the mind: the theory of multiple intelligence]. Moscow, I. D. Vilyams Publ., 2007. 512 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies