SPECIAL ASPECTS OF SELF-PERCEPTION OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper presents the results and the analysis of the experimental study aimed at the identifying of the influence of personal self-perception on the professionally significant features of an individual for the representatives of the state service authorities. The study identified that the expressiveness level of certain self-perception modalities is closely interrelated with the significance for an individual of a certain sphere of life and his or her commitment to the certain terminal values. The detailed analysis of the studies of self-perception showed that self-perception as a motivational-conceptual formation determines the area of “significant” in self-sphere. Self-consciousness determines the direction bonded with the self-actualization formation. It is determined that, in general, the participants of the study are concerned with their self, love for yourself, feel the value of own personality and the virtual value of own personality for other people. At the same time, they percept themselves as fully independent, forceful, active and reliable people, which have the reasons to respect themselves and for which it is typical to have a higher self-esteem, confidence, and the lack of internal tension. However, more than the third part of the sample does not have the sufficient level of self-reflectiveness that proves the inability to estimate oneself critically, to realize one’s actual pros and cons. A considerable number of participants is ready to put the blame for their failures on other people. In general, it is possible to speak about the fact that the most part of the research participants is capable of deep self-insight, the formation of adequate self-image, the consciousness of one’s difficulties, and thus of self-development.  

About the authors

Marina Nikolaevna Darizhapova

Buryat State University, Ulan-Ude

Email: darizhapovam@mail.ru

PhD (Psychology), assistant professor of Chair of General and Social Psychology, Head of Laboratory of Innovative Technologies in Childhood Protection

Russian Federation

Dolgor Radnanimaevna Bazarova

Buryat State University, Ulan-Ude

Author for correspondence.
Email: dolgor.bazarova@yandex.ru

PhD (Psychology), assistant professor of Chair of General and Social Psychology

Russian Federation

References

  1. Myasishchev V.N. Psikhologiya otnosheniy [Relationship psychology]. Moscow, MODEK Publ., 2011. 400 p.
  2. Komarova S.L. Optimizatsiya otnosheniy subektov politicheskoy deyatelnosti. Dis. kand. psikhol. nauk [Optimization of relations of political activity entities]. Moscow, 2002. 211 p.
  3. Sardzhveladze N.I. Lichnost i ee vzaimodeystvie s sotsialnoy sredoy [Personality and its Interaction with. Social Environment]. Tbilisi, Metsniereba Publ., 1989. 204 p.
  4. Uznadze D.N. Teoriya ustanovki [Installation theory]. Sankt Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001. 416 p.
  5. Abakumova I.V. Obuchenie i smysl: smysloobrazovanie v uchebnom protsesse: psikhologo-didakticheskiy podkhod [Education and sense: sense-creation in the educational process: psychological and didactic approach]. Rostov-on-Don, Rost. un-t Publ., 2003. 480 p.
  6. Leontev D.A. Psikhologiya smysla [Psychology of meaning]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2007. 512 p.
  7. Anastizi A., Urbina S. Psikhologicheskoe testirovanie [Psychological Testing]. Sankt Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2009. 688 p.
  8. Bratus B.S. Nravstvennoe soznanie lichnosti [Moral consciousness of a person]. Moscow, Kniga po Trebovaniyu Publ., 2012. 64 p.
  9. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya K.A. Strategiya zhizni [Life strategy]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1991. 298 p.
  10. Starovoytenko E.B. Psikhologiya lichnosti v paradigme zhiznennykh otnosheniy [Personality psychology in the paradigm of life relations]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy Proekt Publ., 2004. 256 p.
  11. Derkach A.A. Akmeologiya. Lichnostnoe i professionalnoe razvitie cheloveka. Razvitie tsennostnoy sfery professionala [Akmeology: personal and professional development of the individual. The development of valuable sphere of professional]. Moscow, RAGS Publ., 2001. Kn. 4, 483 p.
  12. Shikhirev P.N. Sovremennaya sotsialnaya psikhologiya [Modern social psychology]. Ekaterinburg, Delovaya kniga Publ., 2000. 448 p.
  13. Darizhapova M.N. To the issue of relation and self-attitude. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2015, no. 6, pp. 44–48.
  14. Bratus B.S. Anomalii lichnosti [Personality anomalies]. Moscow, Kniga po Trebovaniyu Publ., 2012. 453 p.
  15. Anisimov O.S. Metodologicheskiy slovar [Methodological dictionary]. Moscow, AgroVestnik Publ., 2008. 414 p.
  16. Kochetkova T.N. Self-assessment and self-attitude of a person in comparative context. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty psikhologii i pedagogiki. Ufa, AETERNA Publ., 2015, pp. 164–180.
  17. Gutnik L.A., Hakimzada A.F., Yoskowitz N.A., Patel V.L. The role of emotion in decision-making: A cognitive neuroeconomic approach towards understanding sexual risk behavior. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2016, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 720–736.
  18. Chesnokova I.N. Problemy samosoznaniya v psikhologii [The problems of self-consciousness in psychology]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977. 144 p.
  19. Weiner M.L. Personality: the human potential. New York, Pergamon press Inc. Publ., 2017. 224 p.
  20. Darizhapova M.N. Akmeologicheskie osobennosti samootnosheniya lichnosti [Acmeological features of the self-relation]. Ulan-Ude, BurGU Publ., 2016. 112 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies